EconomyUSA: Corporate Governance: SEC formulates core principles for applicable to publically-traded business
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) formulates 'Core Principles' for the boards of directors of corporations. These 10 principles embrace: the fundamental objectives of a board, management's responsiblity in governance of a company, relationship between shareholders' trading activities, voting decisions, and governance.
I'm waiting to see what Prof Bainbridge (in his blog of that title) has to say on this formulation; he's a/the leading expert on corporate governance in the American legal-studies profession.
Here are NYSE's definition of core principles for publically-traded businesses:
I found this item blogged on Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation. The NYSE's Commission only applies to companies governed by a Board of Directors, which is already an indicator for size (total assets, total number of employees, etc) and other parameters which point to a given company's phenotype (Dooyeweerd); the NYSE Core Principles formulation does not hold for individually-owned or partnership-governed businesses.
- 1.) The board’s fundamental objective should be to build long-term, sustainable growth in shareholder value for the corporation, and the board is accountable to shareholders for its performance in achieving this objective.
- 2.) Management has a critical role in establishing proper corporate governance, as it has primary responsibility for creating an environment in which a culture of performance with integrity can flourish.
- 3.) Shareholders have the right, the responsibility, and the long-term economic interest to vote their shares in a thoughtful manner, in recognition of the fact that voting decisions influence director behavior and conduct, and that voting is one of the primary means of communicating with companies on issues of concern.
- 4.) Good corporate governance should be integrated with the company’s business strategy and objectives, and should not be viewed simply as a compliance obligation separate from the company’s long-term business prospects. Yet there is a risk that the number of new governance mandates and “best practice” recommendations over the past decade can lead even the best boards to adopt a “check the box” mentality when trying to comply with certain governance requirements.
- 5.) Legislation and agency rule-making are important to establish the basic tenets of corporate governance and ensure the efficiency of our markets. Beyond these fundamental principles, however, the commission has a preference for market-based governance solutions whenever possible.
- 6.) Good corporate governance includes transparency for corporations and investors, sound disclosure policies, and communication beyond disclosure through dialogue and engagement as necessary and appropriate. Investors also should be held to appropriate levels of transparency and be required to disclose holdings, including derivative or other security ownership, on a timely and equal basis, subject to the recognition that certain information relating to trading and investment strategies may be proprietary.
- 7.) While independence and objectivity are necessary attributes of board members, companies also must strike the right balance between the appointment of independent and non-independent directors to ensure that there is an appropriate range and mix of expertise, diversity, and knowledge on the board. While the commission fully supports the NYSE’s listing requirements generally providing for a majority of independent directors, the commission also believes that, as provided for under the NYSE’s listing standards, a properly functioning board can include more than one non-independent director.
- 8.) The commission recognizes the influence that proxy advisory firms have on the market, and believes that such firms should be held to appropriate standards of transparency and accountability. At a minimum, such firms should be required to disclose the policies and methodologies they use to formulate specific voting recommendations, as well as all material conflicts of interest, and to hold themselves to a high degree of care, accuracy, and fairness in dealing with both shareholders and companies by adhering to strict codes of conduct. The advisory services also should be required to disclose the company’s response to its analysis and conclusions.
- 9.) The SEC should work with the NYSE and other exchanges to ease the burden of proxy voting and communication while encouraging greater participation by individual investors in the proxy voting process.
- 10.) The SEC and the NYSE should consider a wide range of views to determine the impact of major corporate governance reforms on corporate performance over the last decade. They also should periodically assess the impact of major corporate governance reforms on the promotion of sustainable, long-term corporate growth and profitability.
-- EconoMix
No comments:
Post a Comment