Monday, November 30, 2009

Ecology: Climate Change: 'Peer-reviewed studies' on alleged global warming jinxed by EcoloScis

Mark Steyn flails Climate Research Unit docs.  "[T]he global warm-mongers have wholly corrupted the 'peer-review process', says National Review to introduce it's contributor on the topic of drudgery and skullduggery in the eco-biz of climate documents. "The CRU global-warming scandal," Mark Steyn, National Review Online (Nov28,2k9).

Steyn himself comes up with the prize-winnable phrase, "the Climategate / Climaquiddick scandal" -- except, why squeeze deceased Senator Ted Kennedy into this discourse, citing a tragedy of causing another's death while driving drunk. Is Steyn trying to imply that the CRU document/emails generators killed a dissenting colleague while they were driving drunk? For shame! to demand a reader fathom what actually is fancy gibberish logically, but perhaps effective rhetorically. In wr+ting too, "s+multaneity of norm-realization" (Bernard Zylstra) is often required.

Rather, we woud-be rhetoricians, coud we work up some embellishment to a better metaphory-rich formulation around the organized deceit of scientists leading the earth-is-warming alarmists. But not all who worry or, even, protest against perceived warming are alarmists and, therefore, somehow mindless.

Need I add, the Ecology Scientists par excellence (we were told) have now been outed as professional deceivers--impacting, not least of all, their believers who will never understand the actual science or the emails and other docs. Still, a modified version of a scientific understanding of human contribution/dominance in climate change coud yet well prove correct, at least somewhat correct. It's unsettling that the science is still unsettled, especially now complicated by the gurus of deceit who have lost their credibility as scientists, become mere "gurus", leading environment-concerned fowks in all their doability and generosity (and sometimes hypocrisy, as in all causes movements and churches, and current atheist movements / advertizing).

-- Politicarp

No comments: