EuropeEconomics: Recession? : No recession as financial institutions stand firm
various stuff from my thawt and life in a news-bedevilled world, word play and semiotic experiments, with Christian intent but in hopefully creative tension with culture of North America, both USA and Canada, both hither in Toronto and yon worldwide ...
Posted by
Unknown
at
4:32 AM
0
comments
Labels: BorrosoJoseManuel, debtProblems, economicsEurope, EuroZone, recession
MarketWatch Weekly Roundup email newsletter (Mar30,2k7) in its summary of last week continued its coverage of the most recent Fed statement on economic trends, that we noted on the subject of inflation vs slowed growth.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Wednesday said he expected the economy to keep growing at a moderate pace and inflation to stay under control. But he also said there was a risk that inflation would be stronger than he currently expected. ...In the itemized teasers, however, the Roundup repeated its noxious headline of last week: Clear as mud again by restating it in bold as an item headline:
Clear as mud, againTeasing up the full-length article by MR's lead hand in Washington, we come again to the drum being beaten by Rex Nutting, as the reporter deftly tries to get Bernanke to march to the line preferred by many stock-market economists. "Bernanke sees moderate growth, slower inflation -- FOMC's top priority remains inflation, Fed chief says" (Mar 28, 2007), MarketWatch.
Reiterating comments from last week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress the central bank expected the economy to keep expanding at a moderate pace with contained inflation. But he warned that the expectation could be wrong and that inflation could turn out to be higher than forecast.
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- Despite heightened risks from the contraction in housing and the slump in manufacturing, the US economy will most likely achieve moderate growth this year with gradually slowing inflation, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Wednesday.
expand
Posted by
EconoMix
at
1:02 AM
0
comments
Labels: BernankeBenS, economics, economicsUSA, FedReserve, FOMC, growthslow, housing, inflation, manufacturing, prime lending rate, recession, stockmarket analysts, subprime lending rate
Bloomberg's Nick Baker, "U.S. Stocks Climb on Acquisitions, Oil Decline; Intel Surges" (Mar12,2k7).
March 12 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks extended a week of gains, buoyed by $31.7 billion of acquisitions, falling oil prices and an analyst's prediction that demand for mobile-phone chips will grow.For details, click the live-linked headline for Nick Baker's full article.
Dollar General Corp. rose the most ever and led the Standard & Poor's 500 Index to its third gain in three days after it agreed be acquired by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. Intel Corp. drove technology shares to their highest level this month, lifting the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite Index.
Today's takeovers gave investors another reason to buy stocks after last week's unexpected drop in February unemployment and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's reassurances that the economy will avoid recession. The S&P 500 now has recovered almost half its losses since the global rout in equities Feb. 27.
``People like to see deals,'' said Edgar Peters, who oversees $22 billion as chief investment officer at PanAgora Asset Management in Boston. ``They like to see the stocks they own may be undervalued and could be bought out.''
The S&P 500 added 3.75, or 0.3 percent, to 1406.60. The Dow industrials rose 42.30, or 0.3 percent, to 12,318.62, while the Nasdaq climbed 14.74, or 0.6 percent, to 2402.29. The gains came even as shares in most financial companies fell on mounting concern that home-loan defaults are rising.
Stocks advanced last week, rebounding from the largest weekly loss in four years. Last year, takeovers amounted to a record $3.68 trillion worldwide, and investors have said a rally in 2007 hinges in part on a continuation of that pace.
Posted by
Unknown
at
5:32 PM
0
comments
Labels: economics, economicsUSA, home-loansdefault, recession, stockmarketsrecover
Growth "probably will stay moderate until the housing situation turns around," Bernanke said.It's perhaps needless to intersperse here the notation that the US economy, and contemporary mega-capitlaism generally, is based on the norm of economic growth, the maximization of growth in the economy is the norm of economic activity and hence of corporations (with possible exceptions for non-profits of various sizes, and entrepreneur-run small businesses). In contrast to the prevailing norm, the leading reformational Christian economist, Bob Goudzwaard and colleagues have critiqued this very idea of normativity for economic life and theory, claiming we have enuff, bring growth as such way down on the basis of sustainability (thus, a competing norm), and re-order our economic institutions and system to feed, clothe, shelter all the people. and provide clean air and good water in a healthy environment.
Goudzwaard nowadays frames this in terms of the international economic order, which does exist (being required by globalization and free trade) and needs drastic change. I have some problems with this conception of what's normative for the economy and its institutions, but am trying to take Goudzwaard's distinction between norms and goals, especially in regard to the economy--beginning with the national economies of the USA and Canada--seriously, especially in regard to the absolutization of growth.
In short, at present, I'm somewhat at home in worrying about growth slowdown, in feeling better with moderate growth, and quite concerned about rapid growth such as we see today at the extreme in Communist China where a kind of robber-baron and cowboy capitalism has been let loose on its population and the world. It was the combination of the overheated Shanghai Stockmarket and the American false-loans for first-time mortagages that were the chief factors in triggering the recent New York Stockmarket downfall. Bernanke and FOMC surely have their work cut out for them.This is the key detail of a danger-point in a stockmarket-driven economy, where buyers and sellers await breathlessly for a "hint" from the Fed Chairman in order to determine their next course of action, which when compiled into trend statistics affects all of us in the American economy and elsewhere.
Bernanke continued his itemizations of industrial sectors, including the financial sector and futures markets on various commodities like next season's crops in agriculture and drill yields in petroleum that won't reach markets until after the refining and processing into oil and gas. Futures trading is inherently risking in all industrial sectors where it is needed.Getting the stockmarket analysts and economics reporters in the media to a consensus around that "more balanced view" was the obstacle to a more proper pricing across the American economy. This is a thorny reality: how instant-trigger economic actionism, especially buying and selling on the stockmarkets, is itself driven by over-reaction of said analysts and media to a careful and truthful statement by the Fed's FOMC led now by Bernanke, to the best of their responsible ability. There is no built in pause for contemplation.Here I would tend to think a Fed law against predatory lending is in order, but there's huge note of auxiliary issues that flow from making it more difficult for first-time home-owners to get the mortagages they need and, at the same time, have real good prospects of being able to pay-off on a monthly basis. Predatory lending cannot be solved without a national home-owners policy, and that relates to the persistent problems of unemployment.In a week's time, while Nutting maintained his slant judiciously, the headline writer for MR moved from "Clear as mud" last week, repeating it "Clear as mud again" this week in the teaser, to the subhead "Clears the air." But the fact is that Bernanke has remained unchanged, while his explication of the nuances on the situation, sector by sector, has been elaborated. That's good and proper. The only trouble3 is that economists for the stock-brokers' analysts and corporations are yammering for hardedge "clarity" where "softedge" is truer given the limits of human knowledge to predict economic trends and unanticible shifts in specific factors.
Of course, I'm not putting down Rex Nutting, whom I regard as just about the best reporter on overall trends in the US economy, with contacts both in the government economic agencies like the Fed and in Congressional finance committees, as well as in the corporate interests, not least among the economists who work for them and often are them. Nutting is immersed in this guild, as are most reports in his specialty and all others.
------
Cross-posted from BizMix -- reformational Christian business reportage, comments, critiques, and advocacy