PoliticsUN: Enviro global: World government of finances and collections approved by most countries, Kyoto extended 5 yrs until new regime kicks-in

-
- Follow @Owlb
  Tweet this blog entry's URL to friends.

-
Digg (December11,2k11)
— Reposted here by Politicarp and Lawt
-
Climate conference 

approves 

landmark deal

By ARTHUR MAX

DURBAN, South Africa — A U.N. climate conference reached a hard-fought agreement Sunday on a complex and far-reaching program meant to set a new course for the global fight against climate change for the coming decades.

The 194-party conference agreed to start negotiations on a new accord that would put all countries under the same legal regime enforcing commitments to control greenhouse gases. It would take effect by 2020 at the latest.

The deal also set up the bodies that will collect, govern and distribute tens of billions of dollars a year for poor countries. Other documents in the package lay out rules for monitoring and verifying emissions reductions, protecting forests, transferring clean technologies to developing countries and scores of technical issues.

Currently, only industrial countries have legally binding emissions targets under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. Those commitments expire next year, but they will be extended for another five years under the accord adopted Sunday.

Read more ...

Internet: 3 countries: Venezuela titens, UK finesses porn on net, USA muddles 'net neutrality'

Five recent URLs pertinent to regulation of the internet in various countries:

Venezuela:   Chavez defends plan for Internet regulations [Dec19,2k10]

UK:   Broadband firms urged to block sex websites to protect children Government wants BT, Virgin and other internet providers to put access to pornography on 'opt-in' basis

USA:  The FCC's Threat to Internet Freedom:  Net neutrality' sounds nice, but the Web is working fine now. The new rules will inhibit investment, deter innovation and create a billable-hours bonanza for lawyers.

USA federal democrats: Democrats put heat on FCC commissioner on net neutrality vote

USA federal deomocrats on FCC:  EXCLUSIVE: FCC Dems narrowing net neutraility gaps

-- Politicarp, refWrite frontpage columnist

The foregoing blog-entry is cross-posted to refWrite refBlogger Insert.

Philippines: Supreme Court: Court makes fool of itself in sanctioning Law School that defended Comfort Women

I'm not going to talk legalese here, except as necessary.  I'm wr+ting to defend the defenders of the Comfort Women, ladies who were subjected to severe mental and physical immiseration by the Japanese army of occupation during Word War II, and then further exploited by the neglect of the re-established Philippines government over these several decades.

In 2004 the process of defence of the long-suffering women began at the University of Philippines, Law Faculty in Manila the country's capital.  The legal defence began with the formulation of the comfort women petition.  In 2006, Diane Desierto and Harry Roque published their analysis and theory of Comfort Women's Defence in the Journal of International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict the initial defence was well placed in this scholarly journal's pages becawz the contestation was pointed at the responsibility of the Philippines govt (Executive Branch) to address the Japan govt in regard to wart+m transgressions of the latter country.   You can read this very long file for its most relevant pages (91-98).  On April 28,2k10 the Philippines Supreme Court created a terrible day of infamy for itself by issuing its decision in response to the petition and the notification regarding the petition in the scholarly journal where international human r+ts is among its chief concerns, a notification resulting in a level of publicity and scrutiny that the Court coudn't bear.

In a careful law strategy the UP Law Faculty advocates had petitioned on behalf of the "surviving World War II 'comfort women' who were seeking an apology and remuneration from Japan, by asking the Supreme Court of the Philippines  to compel the Executive Branch to ensure them their r+ts to redress" from Japan. [Owlbirdbet Crossover spellings will sometimes intrude, even into quotes and titles.]

I will refer to the Supreme Court of the Philippines as SCP.  The April 2k10 decision of SCP was written for the Court by its Justice Mariano del Castillo, and that horrible refusal of the petition protected the Executive Branch of the Philippines government in its inaction and mercilessness.  It didn't have to bother diplomatically, or in an International Court of Justice, the Japanese government to redress the pain and suffering of the Comfort Women during Japan's WWII occupation of the Philippines.  We must not lose attention to and care for the women who were victims, as much as any combat soldier f+ting under the Philippines military or General MacArthur when he landed in the Islands to dr+v out the occupiers.  But, you know, women don't count, especially when stained by the nature of their exploitation.

-- Lawt

Click the time-stamp to Read more ...