Showing posts with label enviroUSA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label enviroUSA. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Enviro: EPA legislation USA: Construction industry blasts draft law by Kerry & Lieberman

The US Senate draft legislation sponsored by Sen. John Kerry (D) and Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I) "will make it more difficult to cut pollution and emissions by establishing new regulatory obstacles and robbing transportation funds," according to the intro of "Proposed Senate Climate Bill Undermines Effort to Build Greener" (May12,2k10) on the webs+t AGC of America [Associated General Contractors of America].

By Establishing New Regulatory Obstacles and Robbing Transportation Funds, Bill Will Make it More Difficult to Cut Pollution and Emissions from Built Environment, Contractors’ Group Says

“Improving the efficiency of our built environment – including commercial buildings, transportation infrastructure and water systems – presents one of the greatest opportunities to reduce power consumption and cut greenhouse gas emissions. After all, the nation’s building inventory accounts for 35 percent of the nation’s manmade greenhouse gas emissions and consumes 40 percent of the nation’s energy, while our aging and inefficient transportation network accounts for another 27 percent of energy consumption and 27 percent of greenhouse gas emissions.

“Despite this tremendous opportunity, Senators Kerry and Lieberman have proposed legislation that makes it harder to construct new, more energy efficient buildings and factories, improve aging infrastructure and eliminate the traffic congestion that wastes fuel and pollutes our environment. By allowing the EPA a virtually free hand to approve or deny construction and rehabilitation projects, the bill creates regulatory obstacles that will raise construction costs, delay projects and stifle demand. Worse, by taking funds raised through the proposal’s new transportation fees and committing all but a small percentage to unrelated spending, the legislation leaves our aging and inefficient roads, airways and transit systems vastly underfunded.

“The inevitable consequences of this bill are higher taxes, fewer jobs, and continued reliance on wasteful buildings, inefficient infrastructure and leaky water systems. Stifling economic growth and neglecting our primary environmental challenges is not an effective way to address climate change. Instead, Congress and the Administration should focus on the measures we identify in our “Building a Green Future” plan.

“Our green construction plan identifies steps public officials, developers, and the construction community must take to lessen the impact of our built environment. Measures in the plan include doubling existing energy efficiency tax credits for commercial buildings; passing the Building Star program that invests $6 billion in improving the efficiency of commercial buildings; and speeding reviews and boosting tax credits for green building projects.

“The plan also calls for public building projects to incorporate state-of-the-art environmental solutions and for the federal government to make pragmatic investments in research and technology. It makes it easier to launch new transit projects, shifts cargo traffic to energy efficient barges and accelerates federal approval for new transportation projects in congested corridors. And it calls for making the level of transportation investments virtually every expert agrees are needed to improve capacity and reduce traffic.

“What the Senators appear to have forgotten is you can’t simply regulate a greener future, you have to build it,” said Stephen E. Sandherr, chief executive officer of the Associated General Contractors of America.
A more general analysis of the nearly-thousand pages draft American Power Act is reported at the AGC s+t "Senators Unveil Climate Change Bill" (May13,2k10). Among several other ins+tful observations, they display as food for thawt regarding the context of the Kerry-Lieberman proposed law, this display of statistical relations:



Read both articles, dear readers, to guage what is transpiring at present in the woud be greening of America, from the construction industry's point of view.

-- EconoMix

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Enviroment: Gulf oil spill: Vacuuming Gulf's bottom successfully begins

National Public Radio (NPR) website is carrying a goodnews story after all the heart-rending twists and turns of the Gulf oil spill by a British Petroleum (BP) rig. The seabed is now being vacuumed successfully to remove a huge enviro-negative oil aggregation into "a 21-inch pipe nearly a mile below" the sea surface, remove that oil into a tanker.

The details are found in an article by NPR's staff and newswire sources, entitled "BP: Tube is sucking oil from Gulf well." This development by no means solves all elements of the problem of oil in Gulf waters, and does nothing to remedy the coastal disaster to beaches, marshlands, and wildlife -- nor to the loss of fisheries and other mostly small-business income-sources to people of the coastal areas, such as those that cater to tourists and vacationers.

-- EconoMix

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Enviro: G-8 Summit: Bush stuns world leaders with gung-ho freelance carbon-emissions reductions by USA, China and India

Bloomberg.com carries a long and valuable overview of the Brendan Murray and Tina Seeley story, "Bush Proposes Initiative for Cutting Greenhouse Gases (Update5)" (May31,2k7).

President George W. Bush, in a counter-offer to European leaders on climate change, proposed convening a new round of talks with the world's biggest economies to set targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions. past opposition to setting global goals to cut the pollution causing the Earth's atmosphere to warm. He said each nation should be free to pursue its own strategy for meeting targets.

``My proposal is this: By the end of next year America and other nations will set a long-term global goal for reducing greenhouse gases,'' Bush said in an address that set out the US agenda during next week's meeting of the Group of Eight [G8] industrial nations in Heiligendamm, Germany. The talks would ``establish a new framework'' for when the Kyoto Protocol on emissions expires in 2012.

Bush is heading into the G-8 summit having rejected a proposal by host German Chancellor Angela Merkel to set a target of limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), effectively cutting emissions to half of 1990 levels by 2050. The administration also opposes a cap-and-trade system, favored by Europeans, that would allow the buying and selling of credits to meet carbon dioxide targets. By proposing to convene talks on climate change, Bush is positioning the US to begin negotiations on the next steps to take.

`Huge Step Forward'

Bush's closest European ally, U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair, hailed the president's proposal as a ``huge step forward'' for the US.

``For the first time, America is saying it wants to be part of a global deal,'' Blair said in an interview on Sky News during a visit to South Africa. ``For the first time it is saying it wants a global target for the reduction of emissions'' which opens the way ``for a proper global deal.''

Merkel, while calling it an ``important step'' and ``positive,'' was more cautious in her reaction.

``When it comes to the concrete formulation for Heiligendamm, though, we certainly have to continue to work on it,'' she said during a news conference in Berlin. ``But I do see movement on the issue.''

The president's critics said the administration was still trailing behind allies, state officials and US companies in addressing global warming and the proposal didn't offer much in the way of concrete progress.
G8 Summit, Heiligendamm, Germany > Enviro
`Isolated'

``The White House is just trying to hide the fact that the president is completely isolated among the G-8 leaders by calling vaguely for some agreement next year, right before he leaves office,'' Philip Clapp, president of the National Environmental Trust, said in a statement.

National Wildlife Federation President Larry Schweiger called the plan ``is an attempt to muddy the waters for the next president.''

``If President Bush were serious about this plan, he should have offered it six years ago when he rejected the Kyoto treaty,'' Schweiger said in a statement.

The proposal addresses one of Bush's objections to the 1997 Kyoto agreement -- which required industrialized nations to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 2012 -- by including India and China. Bush pulled the US out of the accord.

India and China

``To develop this goal, the United State will convene a series of meetings of nations that produce the most greenhouse gas emissions [GHGs], including nations with rapidly growing economies like India and China,'' Bush said. ``In addition to his long- term global goal, each country would establish mid-term national targets and programs that reflect their own mix of energy sources and future energy needs.''

The U.S. is the biggest producer of greenhouse gases, among them carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. Bush's chief environmental adviser, James Connaughton, said the U.S. had a net reduction of such emissions of 1.3 percent in 2006 even as the economy grew. While part of that is attributable to cooler summers and warmer winters, he said, ``we're getting more output with the same or slightly increasing amount of energy.''

Bush said the US-led climate change talks would include industry leaders so that technological advances are part of the solution.

``We need to harness the power of technology to help nations meet their growing energy needs while protecting the environment and addressing the challenge of global climate change,'' Bush said.

James Hansen, a climatologist and director of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies at the National Aeronautics Space Administration, said he won't be persuaded that the administration is serious about addressing climate change unless the targets are mandatory. ...

The G-8 countries are the U.S., Japan, Germany, the U.K., France, Italy, Canada and Russia. The U.S. economy accounts for about 45 percent of the group's $29.3 trillion in annual economic output.

More coverage:


* A carbon-neutral house? -- Plan would offset emissions by end of current Congress


* US carbon emissions fell 1.3% in 2k6


* Bush wants greehghouse gas summit


* Bush seeks global warming goal with China, India (2nd roundup)


* International Herald Tribune carries a G8 Summit story, by Brian Knowlton"Bush calls for action to reduce greenhouse gases'" (May31,2k7):

WASHINGTON: President George W. Bush reversed previous policy on Thursday and called for the first time on the world's top greenhouse-gas emitters to meet and agree, by next year, on goals to cut emissions aimed at averting potentially catastrophic global warming.

"In recent years, science has deepened our understanding of climate change; it opened new possibilities for confronting it," Bush said. "The United States takes this issue seriously."

It was the most significant call for action on climate change from a president who angered much of the world in 2000 when he rejected the Kyoto Protocol on global warming.

For the first time, Bush has now accepted the principle of goals for emissions reduction. His effort also would pointedly include India and China, whose fast-growing economies now rank them among the worst greenhouse-gas emitters.

Bush's call came a week before the Group of 8 industrialized countries are to meet in Germany, where Chancellor Angela Merkel had planned personally to press the president for bolder action on climate change. Bush's comments appeared, at least in part, to be an effort to seize the initiative from the Europeans - while endorsing a less-ambitious approach and giving countries 18 months before taking any action.
Also another story with another slant, this time in the Daily Telegraph [London, UK] by David Blair and Richard Spencer, Bush 'undermines G8 with new climate plan' (May31,2k7):
President George W Bush was accused of "spoiling" next week's G8 summit today after he announced that America would not agree to reduce its carbon emissions before a new conference next year.

Germany, which holds the presidency of the G8 group of rich countries, had hoped to reach a landmark deal on climate change when leaders gather in the Baltic town of Heiligendamm.

Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, has proposed a global agreement limiting any increase in world temperatures to no more than two degrees Celsius.

In practice, scientists believe this would require a reduction of 50 per cent in global carbon emissions below the 1990 level by 2050.

But Mr Bush's latest speech might have destroyed any chance of a deal being agreed next week. He said that America and the group of 15 countries forming the world's largest economies should meet to discuss the issue next year.

This conference would convene shortly before America's next presidential election and a few months before Mr Bush steps down.

When this meeting happens, Mr Bush said: "America and other nations will set a long-term global goal for reducing greenhouse gases. To develop this goal, the United States will convene a series of meetings of nations that produce the most greenhouse gases, including nations with rapidly growing economies like India and China.

"Each country would establish mid-term management targets and programmes that reflect their own mix of energy sources and future energy needs."
For me, this Bush move makes the G8 Summit vitallty interesting, and the move Bush recently made regarding fiting AIDs increases the likelihood of approval also of Blair's own proposal to renew the G8's Africa Promises from the last summit.