Showing posts with label ToriesUK. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ToriesUK. Show all posts

Sunday, July 04, 2010

PoliticsUK: Govt: Cameron's Tories (+ LibDems) prepare for "political war" over reducing the Brit govt bureaucracy ... fewer regulations?



"the Cameron government is prepared to wage a political war
to reduce the size of the public sector in Britain, 
which expanded rapidly under Labour .... "

 Cameron's Tories (+ LibDems) -- hereafter termed "the coalition" -- British govt coalition is preparing itself and the public generally, for "political war" over the issue of reducing the Brit govt bureaucracy ... I stretch from a seemingly distant issue, that of fewer regulations?  Bringing the two lines of policy thawt to an intersection at this moment ... I ask what has "tax and axe" have to do with the question of 'fewer regulations'?

Off hand, it seems to me that with fewer bureaucrats at tempered-down wages (the crewcuts) and salaries (the bigwigs), fewer bureaucrats to do the work, therefore peripheral services have to go.  Less service to the public.

The just mentioned negative -- "less service to the public, except in the case of medical professionals and facilities" and one more exception, I can't quite remember no time to look it up no time notime time-knot  -- when the rubric admits the redefinition of its terms  -- less service for now, but aiming steadily toward optimal service.  In my definitions of norms for govt support of medicine I woud include centrally the goal of optimal service.

But of course medical economics relying on govt support of several kinds, becomes enkaptic in advanced industrial/ woudbe postindustrial countries amidst world globalization, medical economics becomes enkaptic within political economics, and more pinpointedly within politics of the electoral kind.  You duck out from under certain problems, while taking on other's -- to which  of the possibly multiple others do you give the priority?,  and then the penultimate status? -- is the sheer stuff of political strategy in a multi-party (at least triparty) system, such as is Britain at present.

-- Politicarp, reading NYT 

And concerned for UK reformationals in their daily lives, including their incomes, banking, and further financials an austerity govt is an austerity govt, a severity govt ... consistent enforcement is the key ... the question of the over use of policing function? 

Is this an optimal occasion for establishment of a Christian Labour Association of England (CLAE), at least a ginger group working by mutual storytelling and systemic-oriented discussion -- say, once a month -- toward establishing eventually a General Workers Local to think, network, propagandize for, and recruit -- beginning with one's Christian networks and merging them with one another to produce an iniitial contacts list.

But, in philosophical terms focussed  especially for the disciplines of organizational, operational, and leadership studies, CLAE woud have the necessity of making clear to all interested in membership in a CLAE Trade Local  or a Company-Wide Local (say, in the building trades and in specific-trade orgs parallel to those of  CUTT).   In this philosophy of labour-ethics and labour-representation theory, membership does not exclude workers who are not Christians.  Every member is free, as far as CLAE is concerned, to determine in their own consciences how to speak of their religious identity.  


-- P

Thursday, November 05, 2009

PoliticsEU: UK Tories: France says Conserv leader Cameron "autistic," some EastGermans pine for old days of Communism

Pierre Lellouche, considered pro-Brit in Sarkozy-era cabinet (France), blasts UK's Tory leader, David Cameron, "France: autistic Tories have castrated UK in Europe" (by Nicolas Watt, Patrick Wintour, and Allegra Stratton, Guardian, Nov4,2k4). The piece reports the furious response of European leaders to yesterday's letter of Cameron to the President of the EU, acknowledging the very recent full adoption of the EU's Lisbon Treaty. And therefore the appropriate but reluctant dropping of Cameron's previously proposed referendum for lessened UK involvement with Europe, altogther. Cameron, then -- in his mentioned letter to CzechRep's Klaus (presently head of European Parliament) -- went on to build a new moat, closer to the castle, so to speak, that woud set impregnable barriers, thus containing European sway over Britain.

On the man initiating all these wordy reverberations, see: David Cameron, for a profile and a survey of recent event's involving this newmaker.

Meanwhile, Germany is undergoing a longterm reappraisal of the "split over the past" that divides the former West Germany from its soulmate the former East Germany which was Communist-dominated for some decades -- until precisely the fall of the Berlin Wall. This page in Washington Post, "In unified Germany, split over the past" carries a photo gallery feature "Tearing down the Wall in 1989."

Recall the USA's President, Ronald Reagan's appeal, "Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall." And the wall came tumblin down.

Apparently some regions and movements in Europe are feeling claustrophobic just now, around the time of the closing of the mechanisms that allowed meandering from the Eurofold, closing down around the Treaty of Lisbon which had been held in abeyance for a number of years, until Klaus affixed his signature the other day, Cameron wrote his letter accepting the basis for his promised UK referendum on European relations, shoud he be elected Britain, UK, England's new Prime Minister.

-- Politicarp